Psilocybin-Research.comSearchable psilocybin and psilocin bibliometric database.
Email alerts

Application overview

Source-labeled psilocybin and psilocin literature for search, monitoring, export, and citation workflows.

How the research index is built

Eight research sources feed Psilocybin-Research.com PubMed, OpenAlex, Crossref, Europe PMC, ClinicalTrials.gov, PsyArXiv, bioRxiv, and medRxiv provide records that are reconciled into the central research index. psilocybin-research.com PubMed OpenAlex Crossref Europe PMC ClinicalTrials.gov PsyArXiv bioRxiv medRxiv
Source records are fetched, reconciled, and labeled before appearing in the live index. The original sources remain authoritative.

Research workflow

Search, filter, export, analyze, and monitor publications with source labels, publication status, citation links, alerts, API access, and a rights-safe SQLite download. Read about the methods and limitations. Explore the dataset and reuse guide or research trends by year.

Open research · Psilocybin & psilocin

Compare findings

Compare selected psilocybin depression and alcohol-use reports by population, design, sample, endpoint, finding and limitations with original source links.

Free access · No subscription for research tools or data exports

Compare selected original reports

This educational comparison reuses the original annotations in our evidence guides. It is a selected set, not a systematic review or an independently clinically reviewed treatment recommendation. Source-check dates belong to the annotations and do not advance when the page is rebuilt.

3 selected reports. Different scales, comparators and follow-up times must not be ranked as equivalent effects.
Report and populationDesign and sampleEndpointFindingLimitations
Johnson et al. · 2026 randomized pilot

Psychiatrically healthy adult cigarette smokers

Source checked 2026-10-09

Indexed record

Open-label randomized comparison: one psilocybin session versus nicotine patches; both groups received manualized cognitive behavioral therapy

82 randomized: 42 psilocybin, 40 nicotine patch

Biochemically verified prolonged abstinence at six months; intention-to-treat analysisPrimary abstinence comparison favored psilocybin

17/42 (40.5%) versus 4/40 (10.0%): odds ratio 6.12, 95% CI 1.99–23.26, p=0.003. Seven-day point-prevalence abstinence was a separate secondary endpoint.

Unblinded pilot at one centre, with different treatment contact time and a selected population. It does not compare against every established cessation treatment. No serious events were attributed to either intervention; this does not establish absence of rare harms.
Johnson et al. · 2014 pilot

Nicotine-dependent smokers with previous quit attempts

Source checked 2026-10-09

Indexed record

Open-label single-group psilocybin programme with cognitive behavioral therapy

15 participants; no randomized comparator

Biologically verified seven-day point-prevalence abstinence at six monthsPreliminary uncontrolled finding

12/15 participants (80%) met this abstinence definition at six months.

A seven-day window does not mean continuous abstinence. Without a concurrent control, the contribution of psilocybin, therapy and selection cannot be separated.
Johnson et al. · 2017 follow-up

The same 15-person cohort as the 2014 pilot

Source checked 2026-10-09

Indexed record

Longer follow-up of the earlier uncontrolled programme; not an independent trial

15 assessed at 12 months; 12 returned for later follow-up

Biologically verified abstinence at 12 months and longer-term assessmentFollow-up of the original cohort

10/15 (67%) were abstinent at 12 months; 9/15 (60%) at longer follow-up, averaging 30 months after the target quit date.

Attrition and lack of a control remain. Counting this report and the 2014 pilot as separate participant cohorts would double-count evidence.

3 reports shown