Research question finder
Find source-linked psilocybin evidence for a research question, explore matching publications and trial records, and keep findings separate from registration.
Free access · No subscription for research tools or data exports
Start with a question, then inspect the evidence
This finder connects questions to curated evidence and matching bibliographic records. It does not generate clinical advice or claim that a keyword match answers the question.
Selected evidence relevant to this question
These are original educational annotations from the evidence guide, not a new systematic review. Follow each original report and inspect its population, comparator, endpoint and safety findings.
Swiss relapse-prevention trial · 2025
Primary comparisons inconclusiveNeither primary comparison was significant: abstinence p=0.55; alcohol use p=0.51. Six-month comparisons also showed no significant group difference.
Small sample; a different population, dosing schedule and psychotherapy programme from the 2022 trial. The result does not establish equivalence or rule out a clinically relevant effect.
Source checked 2026-10-07Bogenschutz et al. · 2022
Primary endpoint favored psilocybin9.7% with psilocybin versus 23.6% with active placebo: 13.9 percentage points fewer heavy drinking days (95% CI 3.0–24.7), p=0.01.
Participants could often identify their allocation. Results concern the combined supervised intervention and selected participants, not psilocybin alone or every person with alcohol use disorder.
Source checked 2026-10-07Bogenschutz et al. · 2015 pilot
Preliminary uncontrolled findingThe investigators observed increased abstinence after dosing, with gains broadly maintained through 36 weeks.
Without a concurrent control, improvement cannot be attributed specifically to psilocybin. This preliminary report supported further trials rather than confirming efficacy.
Source checked 2026-10-07Matching indexed literature
356 records match alcohol. First 20 shown; status and source labels describe records, not an independent review of their findings.